where can i buy sushi grade fish in san jose

These San Francisco restaurants received a 'poor' grade on their restaurant safety scores THEM KY(Violation corrected Feb. 27, 2015) (Violation corrected Feb. 27, 2015) Ananda Fuara (1298 Market St.)Score: 66 Violation notes: Unclean or unsanitary food contact surfacesDate: Feb. 11, 2016 (Violation corrected Feb. 26, 2016) Ananda Fuara (1298 Market St.) Violation notes: Unclean or unsanitary food contact surfaces Date: Feb. 11, 2016 (Violation corrected Feb. 26, 2016) Rock Japanese Cuisine (Violation corrected Feb. 26, 2016) Imperial Palace(Re-inspection: March 24, 2016 - Corrected date not available) (Re-inspection: March 24, 2016 - Corrected date not available) Happy Garden Restaurant(Re-inspection: Feb. 11, 2016 - Corrected date not available) (Re-inspection: Feb. 11, 2016 - Corrected date not available) Ginto Izakaya Japonaise (658 Market St.) Score: 69Violation notes: Unclean or unsanitary food contact surfacesDate: March 18, 2016(Violation corrected March 18, 2016)

Ginto Izakaya Japonaise (658 Market St.) Date: March 18, 2016 (Violation corrected March 18, 2016) Tennessee Grill (1128 Taraval St.) Score: 66 Violation notes: Foods not protected from contamination Date: March 14, 2016(Violation corrected March 28, 2016) Tennessee Grill (1128 Taraval St.) Violation notes: Foods not protected from contamination Date: March 14, 2016 (Violation corrected March 28, 2016) Mi Tierra Market (2023 Mission St.) (Violation corrected April 13, 2016) Mi Tierra Market (2023 Mission St.) (Violation corrected April 13, 2016) Tikka Masala Ellis (425 Ellis St.) Score: 62 Violation notes: Unclean hands or improper use of glovesDate: March 10, 2016 (Violation corrected March 14, 2016) Violation notes: Unclean hands or improper use of gloves Date: March 10, 2016 (Violation corrected March 14, 2016) Dol Ho Restaurant (808 Pacific Ave.) Score: 69 Violation notes: High risk vermin infestationDate: March 21, 2016(Re-inspection: March 28, 2016 - Corrected date not available)

Date: March 09, 2016
sushi train franchise for sale (Violation corrected April 15, 2016) New Golden Daisy(Re-inspection: March 18, 2016 - Corrected date not available) (Re-inspection: March 18, 2016 - Corrected date not available) Harvest Urban Market (191 8th St.) Score: 68 Violation notes: Improper cooling methodsDate: March 16, 2016(Violation corrected March 25, 2016) Violation notes: Improper cooling methods Date: March 16, 2016 (Violation corrected March 25, 2016) Mangosteen(Violation corrected Feb. 29, 2016) (Violation corrected Feb. 29, 2016) Urban Curry(Violation corrected Feb. 9, 2016) (Violation corrected Feb. 9, 2016) Quan Pho Viet(Violation corrected Feb. 23, 2016) (Violation corrected Feb. 23, 2016) Shalimar (1409 Polk St.) Score: 68 Violation notes: Unclean hands or improper use of glovesDate: Feb. 11, 2016orrected date not available)

Shalimar (1409 Polk St.) orrected date not available) Tea Papa(Violation corrected March 1, 2016) (Violation corrected March 1, 2016) Lahore Karahi(Violation corrected April 4, 2016) (Violation corrected April 4, 2016) Lee's Sandwiches (625 Larkin St. ) Score: 67 Violation notes: Contaminated or adulterated food Date: Feb. 17, 2016 (Re-inspection: Feb. 18, 2016 - Corrected date not available) Lee's Sandwiches (625 Larkin St. ) Violation notes: Contaminated or adulterated food Date: Feb. 17, 2016 (Re-inspection: Feb. 18, 2016 - Corrected date not available) Local Diner (1244 Market St.)Score: 65 Violation notes: High risk vermin infestation Date: Feb. 16, 2016 (Violation corrected Feb. 10, 2016) Local Diner (1244 Market St.) Date: Feb. 16, 2016 (Violation corrected Feb. 10, 2016) L & G Vietnamese Sandwich (602 Eddy St.)Score: 57 Violation notes: Contaminated or adulterated food Date: Jan. 29, 2016 (Violation corrected Feb. 9, 2016)

L & G Vietnamese Sandwich (602 Eddy St.) Date: Jan. 29, 2016 (Violation corrected Feb. 9, 2016) Ma's Dim Sum & Cafe (1315 Powell St.)Score: 57 Violation notes: Improper reheating of foodDate: Feb. 16, 2016orrected date not available) Ma's Dim Sum & Cafe (1315 Powell St.) Violation notes: Improper reheating of food Fang Restaurant (Re-inspection: Feb. 23, 2016 - Corrected date not available) (Re-inspection: Feb. 23, 2016 - Corrected date not available) King Lee's Restaurant (1426 A Fillmore St.)Score: 67 Violation notes: Improper cooling methodsDate: March 8, 2016(Corrected date not available) King Lee's Restaurant (1426 A Fillmore St.) Violation notes: Improper cooling methods Date: March 8, 2016 (Corrected date not available) King of Thai Noodle House(Violation corrected Feb. 4, 2016) King of Thai Noodle House (Violation corrected Feb. 4, 2016) Hong Kong Lounge (5322 Geary Blvd.)Score: 60 Violation notes: Unclean hands or improper use of glovesDate: Jan. 21, 2016 (Violation corrected Feb. 23, 2016)

Hong Kong Lounge (5322 Geary Blvd.) Violation notes: Unclean hands or improper use of gloves Date: Jan. 21, 2016 Sichuan Table (4401 Balboa St.)Score: 53 Violation notes: Unclean or unsanitary food contact surfacesDate: Jan. 14, 2016 (Re-inspection: Jan. 15, 2016 - Corrected date not available) Sichuan Table (4401 Balboa St.) Date: Jan. 14, 2016 (Re-inspection: Jan. 15, 2016 - Corrected date not available) KENNY'S(Violation corrected Dec. 18, 2015) (Violation corrected Dec. 18, 2015) Gourmet Noodle House(Violation corrected March 14, 2016) Little Henry's (Violation corrected Jan. 28, 2016) (Violation corrected Jan. 28, 2016) Kitchen Story (Violation corrected Feb. 11, 2016) (Violation corrected Feb. 11, 2016) Jade Garden (Violation corrected Jan. 8, 2016) (Violation corrected Jan. 8, 2016) Nothing ruins a good meal like evidence of vermin infestation. But rats are just one of the problems San Francisco food inspectors look for when investigating potential health hazards.

Those violations are totaled up and translated onto a scorecard you often see hanging in the window. SFGate producers decided to review the most recent San Francisco restaurant safety scores from February 2015 to March 2016 and list the businesses that rated as "poor," the lowest designation handed out by the San Francisco Department of Public Health. Restaurant safety scores are based on a 100 point scale in which a business should score 90 points to be considered "good" and 80 points to earn an "adequate" label. Anything below 70 is considered “poor” according to the San Francisco Department of Public Health. "Poor" means that during the review, health inspectors noticed multiple violations and those issues were more likely high-risk, which "directly relate to the transmission of food borne illnesses, the adulteration of food products, and the contamination of food-contact surfaces," according to the SFDPH. The most common violations cited for these SF restaurants include unclean food contact surfaces and vermin infestation.

But that’s not to say that these eateries have to close up shop. In fact, restaurants have the opportunity to correct their violations on the spot or with follow up inspections. We've indicated date of correction - where available - from the SFDPH in our slideshow above. "Restaurant health inspections are an important component in assuring a safe and sanitary dining experience for the public," Jot Condie, president and CEO of the California Restaurant Association, told SFGATE. "The public is passionate about food, and certainly the safety of it." Restaurant patrons should keep in mind that these violations aren’t necessarily reflective of a business’s day-to-day operation, especially since things can get a little hectic in the food business. If the restaurant you are visiting ever makes you a little nervous, remember that operators are required by the DPH to post their inspection results. Take a look at the gallery above to see the violations some San Francisco eateries received.