And Errol Morris’s Interrotron camera beats Arthur Agee’s uniform 51–49. Agee, the unforgettable subject from Steve James’s Hoop Dreams, was in the lead for much of the game but Morris’s camera, which has pried into the souls of war criminals big and small, tabloid fodder and other odd examples of humanity, took the lead and defended a late charge by Agee to hold on to the first ever March of the Docs Madness crown. You wouldn’t think that one of Long Island, New York’s own could withstand the ball handling skills of Chicago, but that’s why we call it “madness.”What does it all mean? Not much other than that clearly there are a lot of doc fans out there who like to have fun with the form. Thanks to everyone who voted and took part. This year, it was a brilliant stylist who overcame a modern classic verite subject. Next year, let’s see if Morris can keep his title. I’m thinking Agee will come back hitting 3’s with a vengeance.Voting begins: Monday March 30Voting ends: Wednesday April 1 at midnight ETWe’ve made it to the final, in which Arthur Agee’s uniform (from masterpiece Hoop Dreams) will be battling it out with Errol Morris’s truly inspired Interrotron camera.

Could it have turned out any other way? It’s doc subject versus doc camera! It’s two members of the old-new guard (Steve James and Morris) locking horns! jiro dreams of sushi espanolIt’s verite versus doc-nerd style! how to make sushi rice panlasangpinoyIt’s March of the Docs Madness!sushi grade fish hobokenErrol Morris’s Interrotron (51%) vs. Arthur Agee’s Uniform (49%)Voting begins: Thursday March 26Voting ends: Sunday March 29 at midnight ETErrol Morris’s Interrotron (54%) vs. Bob Dylan’s “Subterranean Homesick Blues” Signs (46%)Arthur Agee’s Uniform (84%) sushi online aldeota

(56%) vs. Philippe Petit’s Cross-Tower High-Wire (44%)Voting begins: Monday March 23Voting ends: Wednesday March 25 at midnight ETErrol Morris’s Interrotron (56%) vs. The Ken Burns Effect (44%)Bob Dylan’s “Subterranean Homesick Blues” Signs (58%) vs. Nanook’s Spear (42%)Jiro Ono’s Sushi (27%) vs. Arthur Agee’s Uniform (73%)Emperor Penguins (23%) vs. Philippe Petit’s Cross-Tower High-Wire (77%)Voting begins: Thursday March 19Voting endssushi maki menu kendall: Sunday March 22 at midnight ETIn the first round, there was some major thumping. sushi online aldeotaWho knew the car from Hands on a Hard Body would stall so badly with doc audiences? Or maybe it’s just that Man on Wire is so strong. The tightest race by far was between narrow winner kid-from-Spellbound over Donkey Kong. The biggest surprise: Jiro Ono’s sushi over the Food, Inc. cow.

In this Sweet 16 round, all eyes are on Albert Maysles glasses in a tough match up with Errol Morris’s Interrotron camera. Albert Maysles’s Glasses (49%) vs. Errol Morris’s Interrotron (51%)The Ken Burns Effect (62%) vs. Banksy’s Gorilla Head (38%)Bob Dylan’s “Subterranean Homesick Blues” Signs (53%) vs. Little Edie (47%)Nanook’s Spear (54%) vs. The Chauvet Cave Paintings (46%)Werner Herzog’s Shoe (32%) vs. Jiro Ono’s Sushi (68%)The Cinema Eye Honors Award (16%) vs. Arthur Agee’s Uniform (84%)Emperor Penguins (57%) vs. The Kid Spellers (43%)The Art of Robert Crumb (36%) vs. Philippe Petit’s Cross-Tower High-Wire (64%)Voting begins: Sunday March 15Voting ends: Sunday March 18 at midnight ETWhat does a chest-beating, commercialized college basketball tournament have to do with documentary filmmaking? Well, wait, not so fast. If you can cut through the tired machismo and Buffalo Wild Wings ads, the big NCAA contest is all about thrilling, climactic finishes, underdog heroes, stirring storylines, heart-breaking losses and unbelievable performances.

It’s about putting it all out there. And it’s about passionate fans.I might as well be talking about documentary filmmaking. And while colleges with great basketball traditions have inspiring, famous mascots, the doc world has its own. Both have iconic moments that can be replayed ad nauseam. Both have legends and crowd-favorites.With all of this in mind, I present to you the March of the Docs Madness tournament. We invite you to vote for the doc icons that you believe should move on to the next level. Your vote is not a prediction — it will really be counted as we see which symbols make it to the finals, which will happen concurrently with NCAA tournament.In this first round of our contest, we have documentary titans (Michael Moore, Al Maysles) squaring off and some upstarts (Josh Fox) slamming the boards with legends (Werner Herzog). Michael Moore’s Baseball Cap (29%) vs. Albert Maysles’s Glasses (71%)Errol Morris’s Interrotron (66%) vs. Robert Drew’s 16mm Auricon Camera (34%)The “Kid Stays In The Picture” Effect (39%) vs. The Ken Burns Effect (61%)Super-Sized McDonald’s Meal (44%) vs. Banksy’s Gorilla Head (56%)David Byrne’s Big Suit (37%) vs. Bob Dylan’s “Subterranean Homesick Blues” Signs (63%)Willi Ninja Voguing (38%) vs. Little Edie (62%)Helvetica Font (40%) vs. Nanook’s Spear (60%)The Chauvet Cave Paintings (64%) vs. Henry Darger’s

15,145-page “In the Realms of the Unreal” (36%)Werner Herzog’s Shoe (61%) vs. Josh Fox’s Banjo (39%)Jiro Ono’s Sushi (52%) vs. Cow You’ll Never Look At The Same Way Again (48%)The Parkas of the Sundance Film Festival (38%) vs. The Cinema Eye Honors Award (62%)Jeff Ho’s Skateboards (26%) vs. Arthur Agee’s Uniform (74%)Emperor Penguins (73%) vs. Bugs Up Close (27%)The Kid Spellers (51%) vs. Donkey Kong (49%)Al Gore’s Keynote Presentation (32%) vs. The Art of Robert Crumb (68%)Philippe Petit’s Cross-Tower High-Wire (79%) vs. A Brand New Nissan Hardbody Truck (21%)Get more documentary film news and features: Subscribe to POV’s documentary blog, like POV on Facebook or follow us on Twitter @povdocs.One of my favorite documentaries is Jiro Dreams of Sushi. It tells the story of Jiro Ono, an 85-year-old sushi master widely considered to be the finest sushi chef in Japan. Towards the beginning of the movie, Jiro says, “Once you decide on your occupation… you must immerse yourself in your work.

You have to fall in love with your work. Never complain about your job. You must dedicate your life to mastering your skill. That’s the secret of success… and is the key to being regarded honorably.” As anyone who has contemplated attending law school knows, many well-meaning givers of advice emphasize the value of taking time off between college and law school. I worked three years in a profession completely unrelated to law, and I think there are many good reasons for heeding this admonition. But I am not here to reiterate those reasons. And at the end of the day, attending law school is an important life decision that no one can (or should) dictate for you. But I think there is one key lesson that one can only learn after having a full-time job. Work is often dull. That does not mean work cannot be simultaneously fulfilling, gratifying, and meaningful. But no matter what the activity, if you do it for 40 or more hours a week (and for lawyers, it will definitely be more than 40), for a long enough time, you are going to find it challenging to be fully engaged most of the time.

And I had a “cool” job, brewing beer for a craft brewery. I never sat at a desk, and I got to drive a forklift, grow a beard, work with cool machines, and score plenty of free beer. But being a small business, some days you come into work and you’re asked to clean, fill, and stack kegs for ten hours (or more). And you do it, because that’s what needs to get done. But in doing the boring stuff, you learn what makes you happy. The answer to that question will vary for everyone, but here’s a hint—“what” you do does not dictate how happy you will be. For me, I found I was happiest when I had the opportunity to take on long-term projects and was given input on solving big-picture problems. Other people might prefer having a job that constantly puts them in front of new people, or to be given projects that can be solved by the end of the day. If you take joy in the daily tasks, then it will be much easier to fall in love with your work. The legal profession has space for all types of people, but it’s easy in law school to be blinded by the “what” questions.